Spring 2021 Analysis
Overall Performance
| Legend | Below Expectation (0 and 1) |
Meet Expectation (2 and 3) |
Exceed Expectation (4 and 5) |
Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Students | 6 | 76 | 33 | 115 |
| Percentage | 5% | 66% | 29% | |
| Final score (M+E) | - | 66% | 29% | 95% |
Breakdown
| Learning Objectives for Ethical Competency | Define the Ethical Dilemma | Identify the Affected Parties (Stakeholders) | Identify Alternatives | Identify the Consequences of Each Alternative | Choose an Ethical Course of Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average Score for Each Objective | 3.5 | 3.2 |
3.8 | 3.1 |
3.4 | |||
- Results suggest that overall Student performance in ethics is appropriate suggesting that students are picking up the competency in the undergraduate program.
- No indication that results are inflated.
- There is also room to improve on the objectives that students scored the lowest on, which are:
- Identify the Affected Parties (Stakeholders).
- Identify the Consequences of Each Alternative.
Recommendation for academic departments:
- Explore ways to improve the curriculum and teaching methods to improve on the lowest scoring objectives.
- Improving the ethical content as student seem ready for a bigger challenge.
